Climate Science Glossary

Term Lookup

Enter a term in the search box to find its definition.

Settings

Use the controls in the far right panel to increase or decrease the number of terms automatically displayed (or to completely turn that feature off).

Term Lookup

Settings


All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.

Home Arguments Software Resources Comments The Consensus Project Translations About Support

Bluesky Facebook LinkedIn Mastodon MeWe

Twitter YouTube RSS Posts RSS Comments Email Subscribe


Climate's changed before
It's the sun
It's not bad
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
Animals and plants can adapt
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...



Username
Password
New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts

Archives

The Climate Show 15: Michael Ashley and the ineducable Carter

Posted on 30 June 2011 by John Cook

The Climate Show have released Episode 15. The boys were trying to keep this one short but failed miserably. They look at the Eritrean volcanoes, Jeff Master's impactful extreme weather article, a new report on the dire state of the oceans, and Stoat's big bet. Special guest was Professor Michael Ashley from the University of New South Wales (he's the guy who suggested to me that Skeptical Science should do multiple levels of rebuttals, fundamentally and irrevocably changing the website). I discuss my response to Bob Carter's egregious misinformation and manage to throw in a few extra graphs for good measure.

0 0

Printable Version  |  Link to this page

Comments

Comments 1 to 4:

  1. Yikes - it's an hour+ long. Not all of us have spare bandwidth/time to check it out. Can you do a quick round-up of the segment, or at least give the time code? Cheers, barry.
    0 0
  2. Hey, that's a good 15 minutes shorter than the previous episode, so the efforts at brevity are having some effect! barry, it's well worth watching the whole lot. I like to have it open on my second screen while doing other more menial tasks on the first [cough World of Warcraft cough]...
    0 0
  3. To be honest, I rarely watch the show - I download the podcast onto my iPod and listen to it while doing chores. My interview is on at the 45 minute mark and hurtles by for only 13 minutes (over that time, my daughter walks past in the background, our dog ambles by and you can see the back of Wendy's head the whole time).
    0 0
  4. Nice piece. I think your even, good-natured tone is very effective -- like you're not trying to "sell" something, and not panicked -- just relating the facts.
    0 0

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.



The Consensus Project Website

THE ESCALATOR

(free to republish)


© Copyright 2024 John Cook
Home | Translations | About Us | Privacy | Contact Us