On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a "bump" for our ask. This week features "Positives and negatives of global warming". More will follow in the upcoming weeks. Please follow the Further Reading link at the bottom to read the full rebuttal and to join the discussion in the comment thread there.
“It's not going to be too bad”, some people optimistically say. Too right. It's going to be worse than that. There are various forms this argument takes. For example, some like to point out that carbon dioxide (CO2) is plant-food – as if nobody else knew that. It is, but it's just one of a number of essential nutrients such as water and minerals. To be healthy, plants require them all.
We know how climate change disrupts agriculture through more intense droughts, raging floods or soil degradation – we've either experienced these phenomena ourselves or seen them on TV news reports. Where droughts intensify and/or become more prolonged, the very viability of agriculture becomes compromised. You can have all the CO2 in the world but without their water and minerals, the plants will die just the same.
At the same time, increased warming is adversely affecting countries where conditions are already close to the limit beyond which yields reduce or crops entirely fail. Parts of sub-Saharan Africa fall into this category. Elsewhere, many millions of people – about one-sixth of the world’s population - rely on fresh water supplied yearly by mountain glaciers through their natural melt and regrowth cycles. Those water supplies are at risk of failure as the glaciers retreat. Everywhere you look, climate change loads the dice with problems, both now and in the future.
Please use this form to provide feedback about this new "at a glance" section. Read a more technical version via the link below!
In case you'd like to explore more of our recently updated rebuttals, here are the links to all of them:
Myths with link to rebuttal | Short URLs |
Ice age predicted in the 1970s | sks.to/1970s |
It hasn't warmed since 1998 | sks.to/1998 |
Antarctica is gaining ice | sks.to/antarctica |
CRU emails suggest conspiracy | sks.to/climategate |
What evidence is there for the hockey stick | sks.to/hockey |
CO2 lags temperature | sks.to/lag |
Climate's changed before | sks.to/past |
It's the sun | sks.to/sun |
Temperature records are unreliable | sks.to/temp |
The greenhouse effect and the 2nd law of thermodynamics | sks.to/thermo |
We're heading into an ice age | sks.to/iceage |
Positives and negatives of global warming | sks.to/impacts |
Posted by John Mason on Tuesday, 9 May, 2023
The Skeptical Science website by Skeptical Science is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. |