2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #16
A listing of 29 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 14, 2024 thru Sat, April 20, 2024.
Story of the week
Our story of the week hinges on these words from the abstract of a fresh academic publication:
Here we use recent empirical findings from more than 1,600 regions worldwide over the past 40 years to project sub-national damages from temperature and precipitation, including daily variability and extremes7,8. Using an empirical approach that provides a robust lower bound on the persistence of impacts on economic growth, we find that the world economy is committed to an income reduction of 19% within the next 26 years independent of future emission choices (relative to a baseline without climate impacts, likely range of 11–29% accounting for physical climate and empirical uncertainty). These damages already outweigh the mitigation costs required to limit global warming to 2 °C by sixfold over this near-term time frame and thereafter diverge strongly dependent on emission choices.
That dry language and the arc of the authors' research findings unpacks as evidence-based headlines:
The paper's results will be refined, inevitably. With passing time the empirical, already-experienced evidence the paper relies upon to establish its projections will increasingly include measurable economic impact. Meanwhile other researchers will doubtless be inspired to improve on this effort, "what if the authors are incorrect?" being a reasonable question to ask. Equally it's reasonable to ask "how wrong can they be?" Even supposing that the unfolding truth reveals the authors have delivered a 50% overshoot, 19 trillion dollars is not a trivial amount of economic opportunity to lose. Our ultimate truth may also include underestimation. For the time being, Stanford University's Marshall Burke may have the best assessment of this paper, for guiding our path forward: "I wouldn’t put a ton of weight on their specific numerical estimates, but I think the big picture is basically right." Marshall seems suitably cautious; when starting at $38T/year, plus or minus a lot still ends up as a big deal. The big picture includes that we have other urgent needs for funds on this scale and can't afford accidental (or intentional) wasted opportunity costs of this magnitude. Procrastination on dealing with our climate problem loses us important options.
Stories we promoted this week, by publication date:
Before April 14
- Shell says it `lobbies for energy transition` during climate ruling appeal, The Guardian, Ajit Niranjan. Company is fighting Dutch court ruling that says it must emit 45% less CO2 by 2030 than in 2019
- Jail for holding a placard? Protest over the climate crisis is being brutally suppressed | Natasha Walter, The Guardian, Natasha Walter. The legal repression of activism has been fast and frightening, yet it won’t make protesters disappear and only sows division
- Review of Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) reveals numerous, well-known misinformation talking points and inaccuracies, Science Feedback, Darrik Burns (Editor).
- Trump allies target NOAA climate research, E&E News, Scott Waldmann. A planning document for a second Trump administration also recommends the National Weather Service commercialize its forecasting operations.
- Brazil’s cattle industry could suffer major losses without climate policies, report says, Mongabay, Maxwell Radwin.
April 14
April 15
- Global heating pushes coral reefs towards worst planet-wide mass bleaching on record, The Guardian, Graham Readfearn. The percentage of reef areas experiencing bleaching-level heat stress is increasing by about 1% a week, scientists say
- Climate change `bait and switch` threatens sharks and rays, Carbon Brief, Giuliana Viglione. Cold-blooded sea creatures seeking refuge from warming ocean waters may find themselves at increasing risk of deadly cold shocks due to changes in ocean currents, new research warns.
- As Climate Change Intensifies Wildfire Risk, Prescribed Burns Prove Their Worth in the Heat-Stressed Plains of the Texas Panhandle, Inside Climate News, Keaton Peters. In a small Texas city, officials say land previously treated with a prescribed burn stopped the Windy Deuce Fire from entering neighborhoods. But the practice of intentionally burning excess vegetation has faced opposition from some private landowners.
April 16
April 17
April 18
April 19
- EGU2024 - An intense week of joining sessions virtually, Skeptical Science, Bärbel Winkler. A personal diary of the happenings at a large scientific conference from our volunteer Bärbel Winkler's perspective.
- Taking Big Oil to court for `climate homicide` isn`t as far-fetched as it sounds, Grist, Kate Yoder. Are fossil fuel companies guilty of actual murder?
- A primer on cloud seeding, The Climate Brink, Andrew Dessler. no, it did not cause the flooding in Dubai
- Next UN climate talks are critical to plot aid for poorer nations, says incoming president, The Independent News, Seth Borenstein. The man who will run this year’s United Nations climate talks in November views the upcoming negotiations as a key link in international efforts to curb worsening global warming — if they can be successful
- EGU Blogs » GeoLog » The EGU Great Debate: About the Anthropocene, scientists and comfort zones? The EGU Great Debate: About the Anthropocene, scientists and comfort zones?, EGU Blogs, Maria Scheel.
- Earth’s record hot streak might be a sign of a new climate era, Climate-Environment, Washington Post, Sarah Kaplan.
April 20
If you happen upon high quality climate-science and/or climate-myth busting articles from reliable sources while surfing the web, please feel free to submit them via this Google form so that we may share them widely. Thanks!
Posted by BaerbelW on Sunday, 21 April, 2024