Home Arguments iPhone App Recent Comments Translations Links Support SkS

Twitter RSS Posts RSS Posts RSS Posts RSS Posts

to support
Skeptical Science
iPhone app

Download
Android app

Download
Nokia app

Download


It's the sun
Climate's changed before
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Ice age predicted in the 70s
We're heading into an ice age
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...


Username
Password
Keep me logged in
New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts

Archives


Sunday, 13 April, 2008

Cartoon about global warming alarmism

Posted by John Cook at 00:00 AM

Bookmark and Share Printable Version  |  Link to this page

Comments

Comments 1 to 7:

  1. Ha! Spot on!
  2. LOL: It now has a place on my office door right beside Freedom from Reality. In fact it complements it rather well.

    Thanks,

    John
  3. While I seen the writing in blogs of such people as despicted in the cartoon, what makes it funny is that it is the exact opposite of what I see most often, and because of the post times I can even tell what part of the world these things come from. From a psychological and cultural viewpoint such humor and attitude are very interesting.
  4. Hah. I just wrote a blog post about how the Adam Smith Institute's `argument' against green jobs.

    Summary: creating jobs is bad.

    No, I didn't make that up.

    http://tinyurl.com/3ogc8y
  5. frankbi
    You are right on, that "economist" is definately looney.
    We could use a few of those jobs here in PA.
  6. frankbi/Quietman

    I'd suggest reading Walter Williams, Henry Hazlitt or others on this idea before you write it off as completely "looney." I find it hard to disagree with anything "green" these days, but his logic is sound. Trashing a conservationist idea because it violates sound economic principle might well be missing the bigger issue, but attacking the logical economic theory doesn't make sense either. We need to find the common ground that everyone can buy into.

    Good article by Williams here: http://tinyurl.com/4oeufl and for Hazlitt I'd point you to this book: http://tinyurl.com/529bop.
  7. LAI:

    My dear Sir, Worstall's logic and Hazlitt's logic certainly can't both be "sound" at the same time, because they happen to contradict each other. Worstall thinks more jobs is bad, Hazlitt thinks more jobs is good.

    I think you may need to revise your idea of what constitutes "sound" "logic".

Post a Comment

Political, off-topic or ad hominem comments will be deleted. Comments Policy...

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.

© Copyright 2010 John Cook Links | Translations | About Us | Contact Us