- The Road to Two Degrees, Part Two: Are the experts being candid about our chances?
- Two-faced Exxon: the misinformation campaign against its own scientists
- Study drives a sixth nail into the global warming ‘pause’ myth
- Tracking the 2C Limit - October 2015
- 2015 SkS Weekly Digest #47
- 2015 SkS Weekly News Roundup #47
- So what's really happening in Antarctica?
- SBC Energy Institute Climate Factbook
- 2015 shatters the temperature record as global warming speeds back up
- Book review: Climate Change, What Everyone Needs to Know
- The Road to Two Degrees, Part One: Feasible Emissions Pathways, Burying our Carbon, and Bioenergy
- Exxon climate revelations are just part of a long history of science misinformation
- 2015 SkS Weekly Digest #46
- 2015 SkS Weekly News Roundup #46
- Video: Drought, Climate, Security, and Syria
- Why were the ancient oceans favorable to marine life when atmospheric carbon dioxide was higher than today?
- Lamar Smith, climate scientist witch hunter
- G R A P H E N E
- By rejecting Keystone, President Obama cements his climate legacy
- 2015 SkS Weekly Digest #45
- 2015 SkS Weekly News Roundup #45
- The thermometer needle and the damage done
- Scientists warned the US president about global warming 50 years ago today
- Q&A: Is Antarctica gaining or losing ice?
- Arbitrary focus on hurricane wind speed has birthed a new climate myth
- Homogenization of Temperature Data: An Assessment
- 2015 SkS Weekly Digest #44
- 2015 SkS Weekly News Roundup #44
- 2015: A Very Bad Year for the Global Warming Policy Foundation
- Newest Entry in Inside Climate News’ #ExxonKnew Story is a Doozy
The purpose of the discussion threads is to allow notification and correction of errors in the article, and to permit clarification of related points. Though we believe the only genuine debate on the science of global warming is that which occurs in the scientific literature, we welcome genuine discussion as both an aid to understanding and a means of correcting our inadvertent errors. To facilitate genuine discussion, we have a zero tolerance approach to trolling and sloganeering. To that end:
- All comments must be on topic. Comments are on topic if they draw attention to possible errors of fact or interpretation in the main article, of if they discuss the immediate implications of the facts discussed in the main article. However, general discussions of Global Warming not explicitly related to the details of the main article are always off topic. Moderation complaints are always off topic and will be deleted
- Make comments in the most appropriate thread. Some comments, while strictly on topic, may relate to issues discussed in more detail in some other thread. Extended discussion of those points should be carried out in the more appropriate thread, with link backs to reference the discussion as needed. Moderator's directions to move discussion to a more appropriate thread should always be followed.
- Comments should avoid excessive repetition. Discussions which circle back on themselves and involve endless repetition of points already discussed do not help clarify relevant points. They are merely tiresome to participants and a barrier to readers. If moderators believe you are being excessively repetitive, they will advise you as such, and any further repetition will be treated as being off topic.
- No sloganeering. Comments consisting of simple assertion of a myth already debunked by one of the main articles, and which contain no relevant counter argument or evidence from the peer reviewed literature constitutes trolling rather than genuine discussion. As such they will be deleted. If you think our debunking of one of those myths is in error, you are welcome to discuss that on the relevant thread, provided you give substantial reasons for believing the debunking is in error. It is asked that you do not clutter up threads by responding to comments that consist just of slogans.
- No link or picture only. Any link or picture should be accompanied by text summarizing both the content of the link or picture, and showing how it is relevant to the topic of discussion. Failure to do both of these things will result in the comment being considered off topic.
- No accusations of deception. Any accusations of deception, fraud, dishonesty or corruption will be deleted. This applies to both sides. You may critique a person's methods but not their motives.
- No ad hominem attacks. Personally attacking other users gets us no closer to understanding the science. For example, comments containing the words 'religion' and 'conspiracy' tend to get moderated. Comments using labels like 'alarmist' and 'denier' as derogatory terms are usually skating on thin ice.
- No politics. Rants about politics, religion, faith, ideology or one world governments will be deleted. Occasional blogposts on Skeptical Science touch on issues intimately related to politics. For those posts this rule may be relaxed, but only if explicitly stated at the end of the blogpost.
- No ALL CAPS. You can't have a civil, constructive discussion if you're shouting.
- No profanity or inflammatory tone. Again, constructive discussion is difficult when overheated rhetoric or profanity is flying around.
- No cyber stalking. Posting personal details of another user results in your account being banned from Skeptical Science.
- No dogpiling. In the interests of civility and to enable people to properly express their opinions, we discourage 'piling on'. If a comment already has a response, consider carefully whether you are adding anything interesting before also responding. If a participant appears to be being 'dog piled', the moderator may designate one or two people from each side of the debate as the primary disputants and require that no other people respond until further notified. On topic comments on other matters not being discussed by the primary disputants will still be welcome.
- No multiple identities. Posting comments at Skeptical Science should use only one registered screen name. Use of more than one account will result in all accounts being banned.
- No copying and pasting earlier comments. Comments repeated from earlier comments (or from other websites) will be moderated. However, short excerpts from earlier comments are accepted if making an on-topic point, preferably with a hyperlink. Note that with each comment, the date/time is a hyperlink. If you link to this URL, clicking on the link will take you directly to that part of the webpage.
- No spamming. Spamming will result in deletion of comments and suspension of the account without warning.
- Commenters must register a valid email address. To register and confirm a user account at Skeptical Science requires a valid email address. To continue to post comments, your registered email address must be a valid email address.
Please note that posting on Skeptical Science is a privilege, not a right. We try to avoid harsh application of the comments policy in the interests of a free flowing discussion, but expect your cooperation in return. If that cooperation is not forthcoming, moderators will resort to a very strict application of the comments policy to your posts, and if persisted with, it will result in deletion of your posts, or the suspension of your posting privileges. If we all followed these guidelines in any discussion, perhaps the world would be a calmer and more constructive place.
When posting a URL, it's better to make it an active link for several reasons. Firstly because it makes it easier for readers to follow the link. Secondly, it enables you to use descriptive words for the link rather than a URL. Lastly, and most importantly, long URLs can break the Skeptical Science web design which makes me very unhappy. To post a hyperlink, use the following code:
<a href="http://url"> Description of page you're linking to</a>
You can use HTML code to post an image (eg - a graph). The image needs to be hosted online (you can upload images at tinypic.com). The HTML code is:
<img src="http://image_url" alt="" />
IMPORTANT: The image must be no wider than 450 pixels. If the image is wider than this, use the width element to resize it to 450 pixels. Eg:
<img src="http://image_url" alt="" width="450" />
Other HTML Tags:
<strong>Bold: <strong>Whatever text you want bold here
<em>Italic</em>: Whatever text you want italic here
If the above doesn't work, follow this advice
The Consensus Project Website
(free to republish)
THE DEBUNKING HANDBOOK
BOOK NOW AVAILABLE
The Scientific Guide to
Global Warming Skepticism