Climate Science Glossary

Term Lookup

Enter a term in the search box to find its definition.

Settings

Use the controls in the far right panel to increase or decrease the number of terms automatically displayed (or to completely turn that feature off).

Term Lookup

Term:

Settings

Beginner Intermediate Advanced No Definitions Definition Life:

All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.

CLAM Bake!

Climate Learning and Modeling Development Environment

CLAM Bake is a complete Python programming environment that allows you to code and run simple climate computer programs.

Getting Started

Use the buttons to toggle between this page, the code editor, the console output, the interaction window and the graphics canvas.

Introduction to CLAM Bake

This development environment provides access to:

Editor — A place to enter Python programs.
Console — A place to view the output of programs.
Canvas — A place where graphics can be drawn.
Library — A place where multiple programs can be save or loaded.

Credits and Thanks

The core of CLAM Bake is Skulpt, the Python to Javascript translator developed by Scott Graham.

The editor, CodeMirror, was developed by Marijn Haverbeke.

Python itself is a robust high-level programming language created by its Benevolent Dictator for Life, Guido van Rossum.

Python Editor

Execution Limit:

Console

Canvas

Library

Home

Arguments

Software

Resources Comments

The Consensus Project

Translations

About Donate

	Climate's changed before
	It's the sun
	It's not bad
	There is no consensus
	It's cooling
	Models are unreliable
	Temp record is unreliable
	Animals and plants can adapt
	It hasn't warmed since 1998
	Antarctica is gaining ice
	View All Arguments...

Latest Posts

One-line rebuttals now available as flashcards for study or play

Posted on 9 January 2011 by ahaynes

Guest post by Anna Haynes

When countering climate contrarianism in our daily lives, those of us without - or caught without - our SkepticalScience App-equipped iPhones, Androids and Nokias must resort to using the human memory. Fortunately, with practice this can work reasonably well; and way to practice is to run through Skeptical Science's "climate myth" one-line rebuttals, in the form of cue-and-response flashcards at http://tinyurl.com/ssflashcards from Flash Card Exchange, a website for making and sharing flashcards for study. You can either "flip" through the cards online, or - if you're the old fashioned type - you can print them out for off-computer use. (Printing them isn't free, though, so I haven't tried it.)

If you do print out the flashcards, you could play Counter the Contrarian with your friends.

Here's a cue:

Flashcard Cue

And here's your answer:

Sample flashcard answer

A caveat: the "one-liner" wording of the contrarian claims and one-line responses is often too concise to be optimal for flashcards, so some of them do look a little odd.

Printable Version | Link to this page | Repost this Article

Comments

Comments 1 to 8:

Tom_the_Bomb at 17:28 PM on 9 January, 2011
Very impressive, except those hyperlinks are a bit of an eyesore. Is it possible to assign a single- or two-word subpage to each argument? This would make links much easier to remember and follow, and would make it easier to jump in to a discussion with the link. Like this:

skepticalscience.com/sun
skepticalscience.com/natural
skepticalscience.com/consensus
skepticalscience.com/cooling
skepticalscience.com/models
skepticalscience.com/uhi
skepticalscience.com/1998
skepticalscience.com/lag
skepticalscience.com/good
skepticalscience.com/cosmic
skepticalscience.com/1934
skepticalscience.com/sealevelrise
skepticalscience.com/lia
skepticalscience.com/1970s
skepticalscience.com/empirical
skepticalscience.com/mwp
skepticalscience.com/settled
skepticalscience.com/acidification
etc.

Other than that, very helpful, thanks.
Paul D at 22:02 PM on 9 January, 2011
And Twitter compatible!
JR at 07:32 AM on 10 January, 2011
What is the rebuttal to "If sea level is rising faster than predicted, what do we not understand yet and how do I have any confidence in the predictions if they are already wrong?"?
archiesteel at 07:35 AM on 10 January, 2011
@JR: "Underestimated" doesn't mean "wrong."

In fact, scientists will often present conservative estimates in order to be safe. You seem to be arguing that scientists should use the high end of their estimates, but that would cause many contrarians to cry "alarmist!"
ahaynes at 05:31 AM on 11 January, 2011
Tom, I agree that shorter URLs would help, as would longer one-liners, which are short in order to fit on the argument one-liners webpage (link). But unless John wants to add more fields to his DB for these, it's probably not worth the effort to cobble them up separately.
Bibliovermis at 06:01 AM on 11 January, 2011
The fixed numbers argument page already has short names for many of the arguments. A 404 redirect could be set up to use that table.

e.g.
skepticalscience.com/sun => skepticalscience.com/solar-activity-sunspots-global-warming.htm
Bibliovermis at 08:09 AM on 11 January, 2011
To further enhance linkability, the domain name sks.to is available from the Tonga Network Information Center for $100 (2 years @ $50).

e.g.
sks.to/change => skepticalscience.com/climate-change-little-ice-age-medieval-warm-period.htm
ahaynes at 11:27 AM on 22 March, 2011
I updated the flashcards to use the new short URLs (link).

But unfortunately (when you're Studying them online) you still can't click on the URL for the relevant SkS page, or even drag over the URL to copy it. A feature, say the flashcard folks; a bug, say I.