Climate Science Glossary

Term Lookup

Enter a term in the search box to find its definition.

Settings

Use the controls in the far right panel to increase or decrease the number of terms automatically displayed (or to completely turn that feature off).

Term Lookup

Settings


All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.

Home Arguments Software Resources Comments The Consensus Project Translations About Support

Bluesky Facebook LinkedIn Mastodon MeWe

Twitter YouTube RSS Posts RSS Comments Email Subscribe


Climate's changed before
It's the sun
It's not bad
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
Animals and plants can adapt
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...



Username
Password
New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts

Archives

Climate Adam - The Epstein Files & Climate Denial

Posted on 18 March 2026 by Guest Author

This video includes personal musings and conclusions of the creator and climate scientist Dr. Adam Levy. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any).

Video description

Jeffrey Epstein was a climate change denier. The Epstein Files have uncovered a number of revelations about how power operates across the globe. And this includes the discussion of climate change - and climate denial - within these exchanges between Jeffrey Epstein and the people he associated with – from scientists to Donald Trump. So what did Jeffrey Epstein have to say when it came to climate change? And what do these files reveal about the links between climate denial and power?

Support ClimateAdam on patreon: https://patreon.com/climateadam

1 0

Printable Version  |  Link to this page

Comments

Comments 1 to 2:

  1. Good video, esp how it is the rich and powerful denying CC in their efforts to hold onto wealth/power even by abusing others or allowing their harm/abuse. Also the circular firing squad thing - arguing against CC and also for it.

           RE warming Canada, esp in the Arctic region. I heard from someone up there that the permafrost soil is too poor for agriculture (without the centuries and millennia of organic matter decomposing), to support the idea that we can just move north as the climate warms and permafrost melts. It is not a solution that will work, aside from the melting permafrost releasing massive amounts of methane.

    1 0
  2. Lynnvinc @1 :

    Similarly, I had heard that the northern Siberian soils would be poorly suited to our standard agriculture.  The picture is somewhat patchy ~ but a tendency to acid and/or sandy soils and low phosphate levels.

    As you say, a great amount of time and effort needed to rehabilitate the soil.  Also the high cost of establishing all the necessary infrastructure.

    With greater warmth, though, the soil would suit extensive grazing herds.  But using the land for meat production would be very inefficient, in a world of 8 billion humans.  Probably cheaper, simply to take measures to counter AGW !

    0 0

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.



The Consensus Project Website

THE ESCALATOR

(free to republish)


© Copyright 2026 John Cook
Home | Translations | About Us | Privacy | Contact Us