Arguments
Software
Resources
Comments
The Consensus Project
Translations
About
Donate
Latest Posts
- Global climate projections help civil engineers plan
- NCSE's counter-Heartland flyers
- SkS Analogy 5 - Linear, Non-linear, and Coastal Flooding
- Trump's Fox News deputy national security adviser fooled him with climate fake news
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming Digest #20
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #20
- Study: inspiring action on climate change is more complex than you might think
- SkS Analogy 4 - Ocean Time Lag
- Inoculation theory: Using misinformation to fight misinformation
- NY Times’ Stephens can’t see the elephant in the room on climate change
- Podcast on National Review & the science of climate science denial
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming Digest #19
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #19
- Citizens’ Climate Lobby - Pushing for a price on carbon globally
- More errors identified in contrarian climate scientists' temperature estimates
- What Does Statistically Significant Actually Mean?
- SkS Analogy 3 - The Greenhouse Effect is Like a Cloudy Night
- Study: to beat science denial, inoculate against misinformers' tricks
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming Digest #18
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #18
- Medical scientists report on the impact climate change is having on health
- Is the climate consensus 97%, 99.9%, or is plate tectonics a hoax?
- New publication: Does it matter if the consensus on anthropogenic global warming is 97% or 99.99%?
- Climate contrarians want to endanger the EPA endangerment finding
- Evidence Squared #10: Debunking William Happer's carbon cycle myth
- SkS Team - Marching for Science around the globe
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming Digest #17
- NY Times hired a hippie puncher to give climate obstructionists cover
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #17
- Evidence Squared: Episode 9
Satellitenmessungen stimmen mit den Ergebnissen der Modelle überall überein, nur nicht in den Tropen. Es gibt Unsicherheiten mit den tropischen Daten, da verschiedene Teams den Drift der Satelliten unterschiedlich korrigieren. Das Climate Change Science Program der U.S.A. kommt zu dem Schluss, dass die Abweichung am wahrscheinlichsten auf Datenfehler zurückzuführen ist.
Das IPCC bestätigt, dass Computermodelle die Existenz eines tropischen "Hotspots" in der mittleren Troposphäre etwa 10km über der Erdoberfläche vorhersagen. In den Aufzeichnungen der Beobachtungen durch die Radiosonden des Hadley Centres fehlt diese vorhergesagte "Hotspots-Signatur" einer menschengemachten Treibhauserwärmung jedoch komplett. (Quelle: Christopher Monkton)
Weitere Informationen finden Sie unter Satelliten zeigen nur geringe bis gar keine Erwärmung in der Troposphäre
Translation by BaerbelW , . View original English version.
THE ESCALATOR
(free to republish)
The Scientific Guide to
Global Warming Skepticism
Smartphone Apps
Das Argument der Skeptiker...