Climate Science Glossary

Term Lookup

Enter a term in the search box to find its definition.

Settings

Use the controls in the far right panel to increase or decrease the number of terms automatically displayed (or to completely turn that feature off).

Term Lookup

Settings


All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.

Home Arguments Software Resources Comments The Consensus Project Translations About Support

Bluesky Facebook LinkedIn Mastodon MeWe

Twitter YouTube RSS Posts RSS Comments Email Subscribe


Climate's changed before
It's the sun
It's not bad
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
Animals and plants can adapt
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...



Username
Password
New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts

Archives

Does low-frequency noise from wind turbines cause

What the science says...

The weight of the evidence suggests that there is no direct causal correlation between low-frequency noise from wind turbines and human health.

Climate Myth...

Low-frequency noise from wind turbines harms human health and causes

"As wind turbines spring up like mushrooms around people’s homes, Wind Turbine Syndrome has become an industrial plague." (Wind Watch)

The weight of the evidence suggests that there is no direct causal correlation between low-frequency noise from wind turbines and human health1 (also Marshall et al. 2023, Radun et al. 2022, van Kamp & van den Berg 2021, Schmidt et al. 2014, Dumbrille et al. 2021). Individual cases of sleep disturbance among people living in proximity to new wind turbines are more likely the result of annoyance about the presence of those turbines rather than inaudible noise emanating from them2.

One historical study looked at complaints filed in relation to 51 Australian wind farms from 1993 to 2012. Prior to 2009, complaints related to health and noise were rare, despite the fact that many small and large wind farms were already in operation. However, following the coining of the phrase "wind turbine syndrome" in a self-published book that year, there was a dramatic spike in complaints (Crichton et al. 2014).


Footnotes:

[1] Wind Energy Technologies Office, Frequently Asked Questions about Wind Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy (last visited March 25, 2024); NHMRC Statement: Evidence on Wind Farms and Human Health, National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australian Government, 1 (2015); Tracy Merlin et al., Systematic review of the human health effects of wind farms, National Health and Medical Research Council, 2013; but see Richard R. James, Wind Turbine Infra and Low-Frequency Sound: Warning Signs That Were Not Heard, 32 Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society, 2012 (analyzing “historical evidence about what was known regarding infra and low-frequency sound from wind turbines and other noise sources during the period from the 1970s through the end of the 1990s” to conclude that wind energy may be causing adverse impacts to some people living near wind turbines); Anne Dumbrille et al., Wind turbines and adverse health effects: Applying Bradford Hill’s criteria for causation, 6 Environmental Disease 109, 2021, at 65, (concluding that, while “[i]ncontrovertible proof of causation has tended to be an elusive goal,” when a lower standard of causality is applied, “recurring sleep disturbance, anxiety, and stress” can be attributed to industrial wind turbines).

[2] van Kamp & van den Berg (2021). A front-page newspaper article from 2015 that attempted to infer a direct causal relationship between turbine-related infrasound and human health impacts based on the findings of a non-peer-reviewed study was widely criticized. See Jacqui Hoepner & Will J Grant, Wind turbine studies: how to sort the good, the bad, and the ugly, Conversation, Jan. 21, 2015; Ketan Joshi, Windfarm weirdness syndrome is real. Just look at our national ‘debate’, Guardian, Feb. 23, 2015

This rebuttal is based on the report "Rebutting 33 False Claims About Solar, Wind, and Electric Vehicles" written by Matthew Eisenson, Jacob Elkin, Andy Fitch, Matthew Ard, Kaya Sittinger & Samuel Lavine and published by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia Law School in 2024. Skeptical Science sincerely appreciates Sabin Center's generosity in collaborating with us to make this information available as widely as possible.

Last updated on 26 October 2024 by Sabin Center Team. View Archives

Printable Version  |  Offline PDF Version  |  Link to this page

Argument Feedback

Please use this form to let us know about suggested updates to this rebuttal.

Comments

There have been no comments posted yet.

Post a Comment

Political, off-topic or ad hominem comments will be deleted. Comments Policy...

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.

Link to this page



The Consensus Project Website

THE ESCALATOR

(free to republish)


© Copyright 2024 John Cook
Home | Translations | About Us | Privacy | Contact Us