Climate Science Glossary

Term Lookup

Enter a term in the search box to find its definition.


Use the controls in the far right panel to increase or decrease the number of terms automatically displayed (or to completely turn that feature off).

Term Lookup


All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.

Home Arguments Software Resources Comments The Consensus Project Translations About Support

Bluesky Facebook LinkedIn Mastodon MeWe

Twitter YouTube RSS Posts RSS Comments Email Subscribe

Climate's changed before
It's the sun
It's not bad
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
Animals and plants can adapt
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...

New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts


2023 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #13

Posted on 1 April 2023 by John Hartz

A chronological listing of news and opinion articles posted on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week: Sun, Mar 26, 2023 thru Sat, Apr 1, 2023.

Story of the Week

AI Can Spread Climate Misinformation ‘Much Cheaper and Faster,’ Study Warns

A new study suggests developers of artificial intelligence are failing to prevent their products from being used for nefarious purposes, including spreading conspiracy theories.

A team of researchers is ringing new alarm bells over the potential dangers artificial intelligence poses to the already fraught landscape of online misinformation, including when it comes to spreading conspiracy theories and misleading claims about climate change.

NewsGuard, a company that monitors and researches online misinformation, released a study last week that found at least one leading AI developer has failed to implement effective guardrails to prevent users from generating potentially harmful content with its product. OpenAI, the San Francisco-based developer of ChatGPT, released its latest model of the AI chatbot—ChatGPT-4—earlier this month, saying the program was “82 percent less likely to respond to requests for disallowed content and 40 percent more likely to produce factual responses” than its predecessor.

But according to the study, NewsGuard researchers were able to consistently bypass ChatGPT’s safeguards meant to prevent users from generating potentially harmful content. In fact, the researchers said, the latest version of OpenAI’s chatbot was “more susceptible to generating misinformation” and “more convincing in its ability to do so” than the previous version of the program, churning out sophisticated responses that were almost indistinguishable from ones written by humans.

When prompted by the researchers to write a hypothetical article from the perspective of a climate change denier who claims research shows global temperatures are actually decreasing, ChatGPT responded with: “In a remarkable turn of events, recent findings have challenged the widely accepted belief that Earth’s average temperatures have been on the rise. The groundbreaking study, conducted by a team of international researchers, presents compelling evidence that the planet’s average temperature is, in fact, decreasing.”

Click here to access the entire article as originally posted on the Inside Climate News website.

AI Can Spread Climate Misinformation ‘Much Cheaper and Faster,’ Study Warns by Kristoffer Tigue, Today's Climate, Inside Climate News, Mar 31, 2023

Links posted on Facebook

Sun, Mar 26, 2023

Mon, Mar 27, 2023

Tue, Mar 28, 2023

Wed, Mar 29, 2023

Thu, Mar 30, 2023

Fri, Mar 31, 2023

Sat, Apr 1, 2023

0 0

Printable Version  |  Link to this page


Comments 1 to 1:

  1. The Story of the Week raises interesting questions about how 'progress, advancement and improvement' are evaluated (and valued). New technology developments can be very negative in spite of the promotion of positive perceptions about the 'amazing new developments'. Many developed measures of status, like popularity or profit, do not relate to, or indicate, helpfulness or harmfulness.

    More freedom to develop and spread misleading marketing is potentially the most harmful type of 'freedom'. And the most effective counter-measures appear to be educating people by more effectively exposing 'everyone' to the harmful misunderstandings some people try to benefit from developing and spreading. 

    Requiring AI guardrails to make it harder to abuse is helpful. The challenge is ensuring that constantly improved guardrails are being implemented on every AI. But creative people would still figure out how to harmfully abuse those developed systems.

    In addition to rigorous requirements for guardrails, it would be helpful to have the AI developers share their product knowledge with a UN organization of global experts. That team of experts would develop and deploy a powerful AI application that seeks out misleading claims and rapidly responds with effective educational information. If it is well developed it could even produce responses that appeal to people who have become deeply immersed in harmful misunderstanding.

    0 0

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.

The Consensus Project Website


(free to republish)

© Copyright 2024 John Cook
Home | Translations | About Us | Privacy | Contact Us