Arguments
Software
Resources
Comments
The Consensus Project
Translations
About
Donate
Latest Posts
- SkS Analogy 5 - Linear, Non-linear, and Coastal Flooding
- Trump's Fox News deputy national security adviser fooled him with climate fake news
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming Digest #20
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #20
- Study: inspiring action on climate change is more complex than you might think
- SkS Analogy 4 - Ocean Time Lag
- Inoculation theory: Using misinformation to fight misinformation
- NY Times’ Stephens can’t see the elephant in the room on climate change
- Podcast on National Review & the science of climate science denial
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming Digest #19
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #19
- Citizens’ Climate Lobby - Pushing for a price on carbon globally
- More errors identified in contrarian climate scientists' temperature estimates
- What Does Statistically Significant Actually Mean?
- SkS Analogy 3 - The Greenhouse Effect is Like a Cloudy Night
- Study: to beat science denial, inoculate against misinformers' tricks
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming Digest #18
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #18
- Medical scientists report on the impact climate change is having on health
- Is the climate consensus 97%, 99.9%, or is plate tectonics a hoax?
- New publication: Does it matter if the consensus on anthropogenic global warming is 97% or 99.99%?
- Climate contrarians want to endanger the EPA endangerment finding
- Evidence Squared #10: Debunking William Happer's carbon cycle myth
- SkS Team - Marching for Science around the globe
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming Digest #17
- NY Times hired a hippie puncher to give climate obstructionists cover
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #17
- Evidence Squared: Episode 9
- New study: global warming keeps on keeping on
- 5 Year Study: What Happens in the Arctic Does not Stay in the Arctic
Daten von Spaltöffnungen sind nicht so direkt wie Messungen an Eisbohrkernen und daher auch nicht so genau.
Die Spaltöffnungen von Pflanzen belegen höhere und stärker schwankende CO2-Konzentrationen.
"Wenn CO2-Daten, die aus der Untersuchung von Spaltöffnungen gewonnen werden (rot), mit CO2-Daten aus Eisbohrkernen (blau) verglichen werden, zeigen die Spaltöffnungen im Allgemeinen eine größere Schwankungsbreite des atmoshärischen CO2-Gehaltes und oft auch weitaus höhere Gehalte an als die Eisbohrkerne. " (David Middleton)
[Weitere Informationen finden Sie bis zur vollständigen Übersetzung auf der englischsprachigen Originalseite]
Translation by Michael.M, BaerbelW . View original English version.
THE ESCALATOR
(free to republish)
The Scientific Guide to
Global Warming Skepticism
Smartphone Apps
Das Argument der Skeptiker...