Climate Science Glossary

Term Lookup

Enter a term in the search box to find its definition.

Settings

Use the controls in the far right panel to increase or decrease the number of terms automatically displayed (or to completely turn that feature off).

Term Lookup

Settings


All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.

Home Arguments Software Resources Comments The Consensus Project Translations About Support

Twitter Facebook YouTube Pinterest MeWe

RSS Posts RSS Comments Email Subscribe


Climate's changed before
It's the sun
It's not bad
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
Animals and plants can adapt
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...



Username
Password
New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts

Archives

CSLDF and the Government Accountability Project Launch New Scientific Integrity Reporting Project

Posted on 17 June 2021 by Guest Author

This is a guest post by the Climate Science Legal Defense Fund. 

Today, the Climate Science Legal Defense Fund and Government Accountability Project launched the Scientific Integrity Reporting Project: a confidential, anonymous way for scientists and others in science-adjacent roles to detail their experiences involving past and ongoing threats to scientific norms and scientific integrity.

We plan to draw upon the stories participants share with us to produce a report to inform policymakers about how to better protect science in the future. Expert attorneys from both organizations will also be available to provide legal advice and potential representation to those who contact us. This may involve offering advice to scientists about their rights and options in specific scenarios or helping scientists file a formal whistleblower complaint or take other legal action as appropriate.

We are joined by a select group of partners who are also committed to protecting and improving scientific integrity in a variety of disciplines: the American Geophysical UnionEnvironmental Data and Governance InitiativeJacobs Institute of Women’s Health, and Union of Concerned Scientists.

The politicization of science undermines public trust in critical scientific institutions, and has devastating consequences for public health and safety. The tragic fallout from the Trump administration’s mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic vividly illustrates this, but unfortunately there have been numerous other examples, ranging from political interference with the release of scientific studies related to renewable energy to diverting hundreds of millions of dollars intended to fund scientific research.

This kind of interference with the conduct of sound and objective science also contributes to poor morale and makes it more difficult for affected institutions to recruit and retain talented scientists. Nor, importantly, are these issues limited to one presidential administration or one political party. They have occurred under Democratic administrations as well as Republican.

The Biden administration is taking laudable steps to assess the weaknesses of agency scientific integrity policies via the Office of Science and Technology Policy, and there are also efforts underway at individual agencies to assess scientific integrity violations that occurred under Trump.

We believe this Scientific Integrity Reporting Project will provide a necessary and important complement to these processes. In addition to providing scientists with additional confidentiality safeguards, we hope our efforts will produce a broader range of responses. Current initiatives appear to focus on the Trump and Obama administrations; we are interested in examples extending both further back and further forward in time to better understand long-term and current issues. We are also explicitly seeking to include grantees, contractors, and others employed outside the federal government who may be aware of a wider range of scientific integrity violations.

Only by fully understanding the scope of the violations of scientific integrity that have occurred in the past, and the mechanisms by which they were effectuated, can we hope to truly make federal science resilient to these kinds of threats in the future. We hope that many of those who have witnessed or experienced such wrongdoing will bravely come forward and share their stories with us.

0 0

Printable Version  |  Link to this page

Comments

There have been no comments posted yet.

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.



The Consensus Project Website

THE ESCALATOR

(free to republish)


© Copyright 2021 John Cook
Home | Links | Translations | About Us | Privacy | Contact Us