Climate Science Glossary

Term Lookup

Enter a term in the search box to find its definition.

Settings

Use the controls in the far right panel to increase or decrease the number of terms automatically displayed (or to completely turn that feature off).

Term Lookup

Settings


All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.

Home Arguments Software Resources Comments The Consensus Project Translations About Support

Bluesky Facebook LinkedIn Mastodon MeWe

Twitter YouTube RSS Posts RSS Comments Email Subscribe


Climate's changed before
It's the sun
It's not bad
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
Animals and plants can adapt
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...



Username
Password
New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts

Archives

Fact brief - Are CO2 measurements reliable?

Posted on 7 June 2025 by Sue Bin Park

FactBriefSkeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline.

Are CO2 measurements reliable?

YesMeasurements of the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are consistent, reliable, and globally verified across multiple independent systems.

NOAA collects data from over 60 sites, including Mauna Loa, which has hosted the longest continuous CO2 record, tracking an annual increase in CO2 from 0.94 ppm in 1959 to 3.33 ppm in 2024. Mauna Loa is ideal due to its remote location and clean Pacific air, while occasional volcanic emissions are well understood and mathematically filtered out of records. 

In addition, hundreds of stations all over the world report to independent monitoring bodies such as the World Meteorological Organization and Europe’s Integrated Carbon Observation System.

Because CO2 mixes evenly in the atmosphere, measurements from multiple systems such as ground stations, air flasks, and orbiting instruments indicate the same story: rising CO2 levels driven by human emissions. Claims of distortion are unfounded and ignore decades of careful monitoring.

Go to full rebuttal on Skeptical Science or to the fact brief on Gigafact


This fact brief is responsive to quotes such as this one.


Sources

NOAA Tracking carbon dioxide across the globe

NOAA How we measure background CO2 levels on Mauna Loa

NOAA What is the Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network?

NASA How do scientists know that Mauna Loa’s volcanic emissions don’t affect the carbon dioxide data collected there?

NOAA Annual Mean Growth Rate for Mauna Loa, Hawaii

World Meteorological Organization Atmospheric CO2 monitoring continues despite Mauna Loa volcanic disruption: AEMET (Spain)

About fact briefs published on Gigafact

Fact briefs are short, credibly sourced summaries that offer "yes/no" answers in response to claims found online. They rely on publicly available, often primary source data and documents. Fact briefs are created by contributors to Gigafact — a nonprofit project looking to expand participation in fact-checking and protect the democratic process. See all of our published fact briefs here.

Gigafact Quiz

0 0

Printable Version  |  Link to this page

Comments

There have been no comments posted yet.

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.



The Consensus Project Website

THE ESCALATOR

(free to republish)


© Copyright 2025 John Cook
Home | Translations | About Us | Privacy | Contact Us