Climate Science Glossary

Term Lookup

Enter a term in the search box to find its definition.


Use the controls in the far right panel to increase or decrease the number of terms automatically displayed (or to completely turn that feature off).

Term Lookup


All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.

Home Arguments Software Resources Comments The Consensus Project Translations About Support

Bluesky Facebook LinkedIn Mastodon MeWe

Twitter YouTube RSS Posts RSS Comments Email Subscribe

Climate's changed before
It's the sun
It's not bad
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
Animals and plants can adapt
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...

New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts


Gas stoves are even worse for our health than previously known, new study finds

Posted on 26 June 2023 by Guest Author

This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Sarah Wesseler

Within the past few years, scientists have found that gas stoves are a major source of air pollution within homes, responsible for almost 13% of all childhood asthma in the United States. But a new study from Stanford’s Doerr School of Sustainability and PSE Healthy Energy, a nonprofit research institute, warns that these appliances are even worse for our health than previously believed.

“This study presents data that is deeply troubling to anyone concerned about the health of their families in their homes,” Gaurab Basu, a primary care physician and the director of education and policy at the Center for Climate, Health, and the Global Environment at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health, wrote in an email. Basu was not involved in the study.

The research, which was published on June 15 in the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Science & Technology, was the first to focus on the relationship between gas stoves and benzene, a carcinogen. 

“We’ve known for a long time that gas stoves emit some harmful pollutants, including nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide,” said lead researcher Yannai Kashtan, a Ph.D. student at Stanford. “This study shows that in addition to those known pollutants, gas stoves can also emit amounts of benzene that can lead to indoor concentrations that exceed health benchmarks.”

Kashtan and his team analyzed air from 87 homes in California and Colorado, finding dangerous levels of indoor benzene pollution while gas stoves were in use. In some cases, levels were higher than those caused by cigarette smoke, which the World Health Organization has called the main source of indoor benzene contamination.

The researchers also found that benzene emissions from cooking often spread throughout homes, sometimes leading to hourslong periods of elevated readings in bedrooms. 

Turning on range hoods vented to the exterior made little difference in indoor pollution levels, the testing showed. 

Health impacts of benzene

Jan Kirsch, a retired medical oncologist, and hematologist who practiced at the California Cancer Center and was not involved in the research said that the fact that such high concentrations of benzene lingered in interior air as a result of burning gas came as a surprise. “I think the study is amazing,” Kirsch said. “I’m sure it’s going to save lives.”

Benzene, which is a colorless or yellow liquid at room temperature, occurs both naturally and as a result of human activities. It’s present in crude oil and in emissions from volcanoes and forest fires, and is widely used in industry. Long-term exposure can lead to leukemia and other blood-related cancers, while high levels of short-term exposure can affect the nervous system. The World Health Organization has called exposure to benzene unsafe at any level; Kirsch said it’s the most potent chemical leukemogenic, or leukemia-causing substance, that she’s aware of.

Health impacts typically occur when benzene particles are inhaled. Cigarette smoke, gasoline, and industrial processes are common sources of airborne benzene pollution, with tobacco smoke accounting for approximately half of all exposure in the United States, according to the American Cancer Society. 

Kirsch noted that benzene can be more carcinogenic at lower levels of exposure than it is at higher levels, such as those encountered in the petroleum or chemical industries. A growing body of evidence shows that a more potent change in gene expression occurs after the absorption of lower quantities of the chemical. “At higher doses, it’s more risky, but per each unit dose, it’s more toxic at lower doses,” she said.

As medical knowledge about benzene’s effects on the body has grown, ideas of who’s most at risk have changed, she said. Historically, the chemical was thought to have the most significant impact on industrial workers. But over the last few decades, this has changed as researchers have recognized that children and others who spend much of their time breathing contaminated air inside the home can also face significant hazards. 

Cooking with gas (and getting more than you bargained for)

Another study published in 2022 by PSE Healthy Energy linked gas stoves to benzene pollution within homes, but its focus was on gas that leaks from appliances while they’re not in use. This work highlighted the fact that, while natural gas consists mainly of methane, it contains traces of benzene and other chemicals that can seep into homes through gas lines and appliances.

By contrast, Kashtan said that his team, which included several individuals who contributed to the gas-leaks study, decided to focus their research on benzene produced in the kitchen while cooking fuel is burned.

Methane consists of one carbon atom and four hydrogen atoms. When it’s burned in the air in a perfectly calibrated setting such as a laboratory, the carbon is converted to carbon dioxide, and the hydrogen is converted to water. But with garden-variety kitchen stoves, the conditions under which this combustion occurs can vary considerably, resulting in different byproducts. “If something happens in the flame — the temperature isn’t ideal, the fuel-to-air-ratio isn’t perfect, etc. — you can get all of this panoply of products that are basically in between methane and carbon dioxide,” Kashtan said. “So those include carbon monoxide, they include benzene.” 

Since gas stoves are already known to generate carbon monoxide during the cooking process, the researchers reasoned that they might also be creating benzene. Recent improvements in technology for the analysis of airborne chemicals allowed them to confirm this hypothesis.

The study also showed that cooking with gas produces significantly more benzene pollution than gas leaks alone. “When you’re using the stove, if you have a median stove, you’re getting hundreds of times more benzene emissions than just when the stove is off,” Kashtan said.

Kashtan also noted that another health-damaging chemical associated with gas stoves, nitrogen dioxide, is generated when methane is burned even under perfect circumstances for combustion.

Politics in the kitchen

The new research is likely to feed into heated debates about how to regulate gas stoves in the United States. Over the past few years, many cities have banned these and other appliances in new buildings, citing their climate impact — methane is a potent planet-warming gas — as well as their health risks. Earlier this year, New York State became the first stove to ban gas stoves in most new buildings. 

But the issue has become highly politicized, with Democrats generally in favor of policy action to reduce the use of gas stoves and Republicans generally opposed. “Don’t tread on Florida, and don’t mess with gas stoves!” tweeted Florida governor and Republican presidential candidate Ron DeSantis earlier this year. Republican-led states like Ohio and Texas have passed legislation prohibiting cities within their borders from banning the appliances.

The uncertainty over the future of gas stove policy was heightened in April when a federal appeals court overturned Berkeley, California’s ban on gas hookups in new buildings, which was the first of its kind when passed in 2019

The Biden administration has shown strong support for electrifying stoves, most notably through the Inflation Reduction Act, which was signed into law in August 2022. This legislation provides generous rebates for electric purchase stoves for households meeting certain income requirements. But since individual states are responsible for implementing the rebate program, the specifics of the timeline and funding could vary significantly in different parts of the country. 

This political backdrop aside, Jan Kirsch said that the study points to a clear solution for individuals wanting to avoid cancer risk from gas stoves in their own homes. “The best thing to do is transition to something all-electric,” she said.

But Gaurab Basu noted that not all households have the ability to purchase and install an electric stove on their own. In particular, renters and lower-income people may have little choice but to continue to live with high benzene exposure in the absence of policy levers to assist with stove electrification.

“This is a matter of health equity,” he wrote in an email.

0 0

Printable Version  |  Link to this page


Comments 1 to 5:

  1. Well, as is covered in the paper, methane flames have long been known to create benzene as a minor combustion product. The EPA even has an estimate of the associated annual national emissions (also in the paper).

    The main point thus is not the finding that benzene is emitted from gas stoves, but that those emissions are much larger than the previous emission factor derived from a "clean" combustion suggested they are.

    0 0
  2. Gas stoves offer convenience in cooking, it is important to be aware of their potential health implications. Taking appropriate measures to improve ventilation and considering alternative cooking methods can help minimize the risks associated with gas stove use and promote a healthier living environment.

    0 0


    Curious why the study "Cooking fuels and prevalence of asthma: a global analysis of phase three of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC)" was omitted from the meta study showing that 12% of asthma was caused by gas stoves.  This study involved 500k + children.  Key statement "In both age groups, we detected no evidence of an association between the use of gas as a cooking fuel and either asthma symptoms or asthma diagnosis."


    Also curious why population attribution fractio was used when it is widely known to be less than robust when there are multiple cofounding variables.  Asthma is a disease that is trigger by numerous factors.

    The big complaint is that PAF doesn’t work when there are multiple confounding variables. The challenge for academics unfamiliar with the tool PAF is found in many widely used epidemiology texts, but often with no warning about invalidness when confounding exists.


    0 0
    Moderator Response:

    [BL] You have previously made an argument against using PAF (probability attribution fraction) on this previous post about gas stove health risks.

    On that previous thread, many of your errors were pointed out, and you did not engage in discussion - neither making counterarguments, nor admitting your mistakes.

    To simple keep making the same arguments, without responding to criticisms or correcting errors, borders on several aspects of the Comments Policy, such as excessive repetition and sloganeering.


  4. David-acct:

    The study titled " Population Attributable Fraction of Gas Stoves and Childhood Asthma in the United States" primarily looks at the United States and attributes 13% of childhood asthma to gas stoves.  The study you cited titled "Cooking fuels and prevalence of asthma: a global analysis of
    phase three of the International Study of Asthma and
    Allergies in Childhood
    " (free copy of the whole paper) looks primarily at open fires and is worldwide.  The selection criteria for the United States study included the term "gas" in the title.  Your curiosity about why a worldwide study primarily about open fires was not used in a USA study about gas stoves is completely misplaced.

    Both studies point out that much more work has been done in developed countries concerning the effect of gas stoves on public health.  Since much more work has been done in developed countries on the hazards of gas stoves it stands to reason that the conclusions of those studies are on firmer scientific grounds.

    In the study discussed in this OP titled "Gas and Propane Combustion from Stoves Emits Benzene and Increases Indoor Air Pollution" the data and discussion are about the release of the kinown carcinogen benzine into peoples houses.  Your comment is about a completely different study and harm and therefor is off topic on this thread.  You often post comments that don't really relate to the OP but complain that scientists are making some sort of mistake.  Perhaps if you were on topic you would have less to complain about.

    I doubt your complaints about PAF have any merit.  Professional scientists are better informed than anonymous internet posters.

    It is beyond any doubt that gas stoves release large quantities of harmfull pollution into the homes where they are used.  You are arguing about a single tree  when the forest is indisputable.  The gas industry kinew as early as 1911 that gas stoves released harmful pollution into homes and damaged peoples health.  This iinformation has been hidden by the fossil fuel industry to further their profits.

    In any case, induction stoves, which release no detectable benzene, are better than gas stoves to cook on.  You are arguing against the rising tide.  In 30 years gas stoves will be as outdated as coal stoves are today.

    0 0
  5. Moderator's comment @ 3

    "To simple keep making the same arguments, without responding to criticisms or correcting errors, borders on several aspects of the Comments Policy, such as excessive repetition and sloganeering."

    This is very good. Its very annoying when people don't reply to criticisms. Its not in the spirit of open debate and discussion. Its discourteous. 

    In my view websites are entitled to require people to respond to their critics, at least in situations like the above.  Nobodies opinions are being censored doing this.  If you dont like being required to actively  participate in discussions you dont have to use the website.

    0 0

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.

The Consensus Project Website


(free to republish)

© Copyright 2024 John Cook
Home | Translations | About Us | Privacy | Contact Us