Recent Comments
Prev 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 Next
Comments 57401 to 57450:
-
bjchip at 15:25 PM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
BJ Chippindale, NZ Dr Jones, you have done well, and the future will know you gave us the best science you could give. -
Tristan at 15:24 PM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
We should all endeavour to keep up with the Phil Joneses of this world. Tristan Gall Brisbane, AU -
nealjking at 14:42 PM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Neal J. King Munich, GERMANY -
sailrick at 14:18 PM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Richard Mercer California, USA -
jg at 13:35 PM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
John Garrett California, USA -
KeenOn350 at 13:24 PM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
I recently sent a personal email to Mike Mann to thank him for all his efforts, both in climate studies, and in combating the "denialist" crowd. Just did the same for Phil Jones. Pleased to add my name to this list also. Thanks for the good work, Phil! Dave Willis, Quebec, Canada -
Crispy at 13:01 PM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Chris Hawkshaw, Sydney, Australia -
tmbak at 12:52 PM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Thank you for your courage. Teresa Baker, USA -
littlerobbergirl at 11:57 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Christina West, Hampshire, England. Oh, brave new world! -
larstbone at 11:45 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Good luck, Larry Johnson Illinois, USA -
PT_Goodman at 11:29 AM on 1 July 2012It's Urban Heat Island effect
I'll think on this. But I'm confused about something. In the Basic explanation of why UHI Effect is not influencing temperature trends, it states "the difference between ideal rural sites compared to urban sites in temperature trends has been very small." [2nd Paragraph, just before Figure 1] In the Intermediate explanation, it is stated [in the First Paragraph] "They compare urban long term trends to nearby rural trends. They then adjust the urban trend so it matches the rural trend. The process is described in detail on the NASA website (Hansen 2001)." So of course the urban and rural trends *should* be the same, because of the adjustment. Am I missing the obvious? -
Pldyson at 11:12 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
The truth wil eventually win out.. Peter Dyson, Victoria, Australia -
def7033 at 11:04 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Was at UEA in early 1990s - Nice town Norwich. Duncan Farrow, Perth Western Australia -
Lloyd Flack at 10:45 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Lloyd Flack, East Ryde NSW, Australia -
Bob Warneke at 10:28 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Bob Warneke, Austin, TX, USA -
citizenschallenge at 10:27 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Peter Miesler Colorado, USA hang in there Dr. Jones -
technophile50 at 10:23 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Brian Dodge, Hillsborough, North Carolina - where they're commanding the sea not to rise nonlinearly. -
raimondo at 10:21 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Ray Mainsbridge Australis -
sunoba at 10:04 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Thanks to Skeptical Science for this initiative, and every good wish to Phil Jones and colleagues. Noel Barton Australia -
David Huber at 10:01 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
David Huber, USA -
ConnorJ at 09:53 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Connor Jolley Australia -
anthonye at 09:51 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Anthony Enrione, UK. -
Philippe Chantreau at 09:45 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Philippe Chantreau, United States. -
mbryson at 09:39 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Bryson Brown, Canada -
Steve L at 09:38 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
In support of science in public policy, and those like Phil Jones who (in spite of those who dislike the implications) make that science accessible to the public and to policymakers. Steve Latham, Canada -
Joe Cushley at 09:15 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
In less than a generation your detractors will look, at the very least, bloody silly; at worst willfully and criminally negligent – to *everyone*. To those who have done any proper reading on the subject they look a combination of the two *now* Keep up the essential work. many thanks. Joe Cushley, London -
Paul Magnus at 09:09 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
We appreciate your efforts. Paul Magnus -
Andy Skuce at 09:05 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Andy Skuce, British Columbia, Canada -
GeoffThomas at 09:01 AM on 1 July 2012Michaels and Cato Unwittingly Accept the Climate Threat
To "ralbin" on cap and trade, just a point of logic, if a cap and trade policy is instituted then the price of abatement is unexpectedly less, that does not reduce the effectiveness of the cap and trade as without it the abatement may have not been tried therefore the cheapness never realised. In fact the cap and trade success is not 'confounded", it is strengthened. Whether regulatory control is better has to take into account the reduced political support for it so reducing the likelihood that it will be imposed. No doubt the solution will vary from case to case, and each measure adds to the general success, (or lowers the speed to more warming, more properly said) but cap and trade is easier to spread across borders into different political realities as it uses common principles, - ie money etc. Geoff Thomas. -
AlwaysWatching at 08:56 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Lyndon While, Australia -
tony at 08:54 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Tony Clifford-Winters, France -
CTG at 08:50 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Colin Sharples, New Zealand (Ph.D. UEA, 1996) -
Griffin at 08:47 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
My heartfelt thanks Malcolm Griffin, Canada -
Tom Curtis at 08:30 AM on 1 July 2012Glaciers are growing
wealthychef @41, figure 1 in the basic article represents a full rebutal of the fake skeptic claims. If you look at it, you will see a gradual loss of glacial ice from 1850, which represents the ongoing glacial retreat for some glaciers since the little ice age. However, two features stand out. First is the much more rapid loss of ice since 1970. If glacial ice loss simply represented the restoration of equilibrium after the LIA, glacial ice loss would gradually slow as it approached that equilibrium. Hence, the recent very rapid ice loss shows clearly that the cause is a recent warming rather than the warming that accompanied the end of the LIA. Second is the brief accumulation of glacial ice from 1950-1970. Global temperatures actually cooled slightly during that interval, primarily due to the rapid accumulation of sulphate (SO4) in the atmosphere from the burning of coal. The important factor here, however, is that that brief cooling could not have resulted in an overall gain in glacial ice unless the glacial ice was very close to equilibrium. That gain in glacial ice therefore contradicts the fundamental assumption of the fake skeptic argument, which is that glacial ice balance is far from equilibrium, and continues to be lost because of a warming episode that ended over a century ago. Typical of fake skeptic arguments, the argument presented at climate-skeptic.com is depends on superficial knowledge of the data to retain its plausibility. -
Charles08537024 at 08:14 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Charles Scott, Canada -
John E. Pearson at 08:12 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
John E. Pearson Los Alamos, NM -
john mfrilett at 08:09 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
John Rilett Canada -
Wyoming at 08:01 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
James Dunlap Virginia, USA -
Uncle Pete at 08:01 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Peter Bergs Brisbane Australia -
jenikhollan at 07:53 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Jan Hollan, Czechia -
ronspross at 07:44 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Ron Spross, TX USA -
Forrest at 07:39 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Mark White, PA, USA -
Andrew Mclaren at 07:34 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Thanks to Phil Jones and other climate scientists for all their many years of dedicated hard work, and for having the courage to stand up to all the abusive denialists out there! Andrew McLaren Canada -
David Kirtley at 07:28 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
David Kirtley St. Louis, MO, USA 104F -
Steve Fish at 07:24 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Hang in there, we are counting on you! Steve, Northern California, USA -
Simon7021 at 07:23 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Simon Edmonds Wellington New Zealand -
John Hartz at 07:17 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
John Hartz Columbia, South Carolina USA -
oneiota at 07:12 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Mahn England, Australia -
dwr at 06:56 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Registered to post message of support. David Rice, Belfast, UK. -
Martin Vermeer at 06:49 AM on 1 July 2012Nil Illegitimi Carborundum
Martin Vermeer, Finland
Prev 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 Next