Climate Science Glossary

Term Lookup

Enter a term in the search box to find its definition.

Settings

Use the controls in the far right panel to increase or decrease the number of terms automatically displayed (or to completely turn that feature off).

Term Lookup

Settings


All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.

Home Arguments Software Resources Comments The Consensus Project Translations About Support

Twitter Facebook YouTube Mastodon MeWe

RSS Posts RSS Comments Email Subscribe


Climate's changed before
It's the sun
It's not bad
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
Animals and plants can adapt
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...



Username
Password
New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts

Archives

Editorial Policy

This policy applies to original content created and published by members of the Skeptical Science author team.

General

Our team of authors write for and publish on Skeptical Science with editorial guidance from John Cook, Bärbel Winkler, Doug Bostrom and Dana Nuccitelli. Original blog posts, new rebuttals or updates to existing rebuttals are reviewed internally before publication and if we don’t have the needed expertise within our team sent out for external review by subject matter experts.

Commentary

We clearly indicate when a blog post is the equivalent of an academic journal's inclusion of commentary or synthesis article (see this blog post for some context).

Corrections to published content

Rebuttals

When we discover and correct an error in our rebuttal articles, we clearly flag this for readers as a boxed note at the end of a corrected article. This notice of corrective action remains in view for readers until such time as the affected rebuttal is substantially revised as part of our routine process of maintaining our content in keeping with scientific progress. 

Blog posts

In case of discovered errors in blog posts published by Skeptical Science authors, we review the issue internally and take needed action to correct the error. The requirement for and action of correction will be obviously flagged as per corrected rebuttals and - if warranted - a follow-up Errata article (like this example from February 2023).

Means to provide feedback

There are several means for readers to let us know about errors, which they can do publicly in the comment threads for rebuttals and blog posts, privately via our contact form or via a dedicated Google-form linked at the bottom of each rebuttal.



The Consensus Project Website

THE ESCALATOR

(free to republish)


© Copyright 2024 John Cook
Home | Translations | About Us | Privacy | Contact Us