Climate Science Glossary

Term Lookup

Enter a term in the search box to find its definition.


Use the controls in the far right panel to increase or decrease the number of terms automatically displayed (or to completely turn that feature off).

Term Lookup


All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.

Home Arguments Software Resources Comments The Consensus Project Translations About Support

Bluesky Facebook LinkedIn Mastodon MeWe

Twitter YouTube RSS Posts RSS Comments Email Subscribe

Climate's changed before
It's the sun
It's not bad
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
Animals and plants can adapt
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...

New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts


The Climate Show #19: A Tale of Two Poles

Posted on 26 September 2011 by John Cook

The Climate Show has released Episode 19. La Nina makes a return, Times Atlas Gate (or something like that), the Petermann Glacier break-up, Pirates cause global warming (not really) and Ice adventurer Rob Swan pushes for Green Growth. Gareth continues to sun himself in Europe so I'm still co-hosting the show with Glenn.

You can subscribe to The Climate Show on our Youtube channel, subscribe to the podcast via iTunes, listen to us via Stitcher on your smartphone or listen direct/download from the link below the fold... Follow The Climate Show on Facebook and Twitter.

0 0

Printable Version  |  Link to this page


Comments 1 to 3:

  1. No, of course not. It is the lack of pirates that leads to global warming. Ramen.
    0 0
  2. Lloyd Flack @ comment 1. The case for pirates being fewer in number in the more recent climatological record relies on a seriously outmoded definition of "pirate." While the incidence of pirates in their traditional littoral waters has fallen dramatically (Somalia and the Indian Ocean notwithstanding) current pirates have undergone a spatial relocation to well organized operations at the worlds financial institutions. (i.e. AIG, CitiBank, along with a slew of Brit, German, and other banks and financial institutions worldwide. And who can listen to Oztralia's own Rupert Murdoch and NOT think "If he only had an eye patch and a parrot. Arrrrrrr matey!") I suggest that the number of pirates has increased in a manner even more alarming than global temperatures, and that the two are positively, and often causally, related. (As to the Climate Show, that was really good, and informative, and I'll be looking for the next one. John Cook is as lucid, mellow and informed on video as he is in his writing on his blog. But the best part of that show for me is that I think I can now tell the difference between an Ozzie, who would be the geest, and the Kiwi host, who has geusts on his show ;)
    0 0
  3. What occurred to me with John's comments about Greenland is that the loss of cover would be from areas where the ice is thin at the edges, so 15% of ice cover loss would not necessarily equate to 15% of Greenland ice loss. This in turn means 15% of cover loss would not equate to 1m of sea level rise. Or is the thickness at the edges similar to the middle? (John Cook does not have an accent but Glenn Williams does. I live in Brisbane)
    0 0

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.

The Consensus Project Website


(free to republish)

© Copyright 2024 John Cook
Home | Translations | About Us | Privacy | Contact Us