Climate Science Glossary

Term Lookup

Enter a term in the search box to find its definition.


Use the controls in the far right panel to increase or decrease the number of terms automatically displayed (or to completely turn that feature off).

Term Lookup


All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.

Home Arguments Software Resources Comments The Consensus Project Translations About Support

Bluesky Facebook LinkedIn Mastodon MeWe

Twitter YouTube RSS Posts RSS Comments Email Subscribe

Climate's changed before
It's the sun
It's not bad
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
Animals and plants can adapt
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...

New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts


Editorial cartoonists lampoon, praise Green New Deal

Posted on 19 March 2019 by Guest Author

This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Michael Svoboda

Like journalists, opinion writers, and TV newscasters and commentators, political cartoonists were quick to respond to the Green New Deal (GND) climate change initiative put out in early February by two liberal northeastern Democrats in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives.

But there were striking differences in willingness to engage the issue, depending on the political leaning of the respondents and the mediums in which they were working.

Written analyses and commentaries, left and right, were roughly equal in number. In pieces published in a range of outlets, from AP to Vice, liberal commentators praised the plan for its bold vision even as some questioned specific details. Conservative commentators, published mostly in venues on the right (Federalist, Townhall, Washington Examiner, Washington Timesmocked what they saw as the plans’ unrealistic goals, warned about its supposed socialist underpinnings, or in some cases even thanked Democrats for embracing a plan so absurd that it just might increase chances of a Trump re-election in 2020 and decrease the odds that Democrats take back the Senate.

By contrast, a study of cable TV coverage of the Green New Deal by Media Matters found that right-leaning Fox News ran three times as many pieces as center-left CNN and left-leaning MSNBC – combined. And in its derisive commentary, Fox often failed to mention climate change. (See Real Clear Politics’ intriguing analysis and time line of online coverage of GND. The conclusion of the piece: “Perhaps the biggest takeaway is that despite social media increasingly becoming the tool du jour of the political class, … we still very much need to keep an eye on traditional news media and on search trends.”

But the imbalance between the left and right among political cartoonists was even more striking. In the first 10 days after the Green New Deal was announced, right-leaning artists published nearly five times as many cartoons as their more numerous left-leaning colleagues.

This count was determined by examining all the left- and right-leaning cartoons posted at between February 5, when news of the GND announcement was leaked, and February 17. The same dates were used to define a review of cartoons posted at the website of the socially conservative Townhall.

Together the two sites offered six GND cartoons posted by the 27 left-leaning cartoonists whose work is archived at, and 28 cartoons posted by 19 right-leaning cartoonists (13 whose work is archived at and another six whose work was archived by

From the right

Conservative cartoonists used select aspects of the Green New Deal and its public announcement – Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (aka AOC), and dramatic descriptions of the GND’s grand aspirations, such as limiting the flatulent emissions from cows. They focused their pointed barbs on three basic points:

  • the plan is unrealistic, idealistic, naïve and  even surreal;
  • the plan will cost taxpayers far too much and meddle far too deeply into their private affairs; and
  • the “green” plan will advance what they see as liberals’ long-standing “socialist” agenda.

The third point, about liberals’ putative socialist agenda, is made most directly by AF Branco’s February 5 cartoon, drawn in anticipation of the February 7 announcement, depicting the GND as a Trojan Horse. To ensure that readers grasp his literary allusion, Branco brands the green horse with a Soviet sickle and hammer and adds a banner for “Freedom” below the American flag waving over the guarded walls.

Branco cartoon

Most of Branco’s conservative colleagues chose to deliver more subtle messages and leavened them with more humor, even whimsy. Nearly two-thirds included a reference or depiction of AOC, often in comic scenes with cows.

Mike Lester, in the cartoon posted the day after the GND announcement, depicts AOC admonishing a cow for not controlling its emissions. He then uses the cow farts, which have knocked out Uncle Sam, to highlight the measures he thinks conservatives will find most objectionable.

Lester cartoon

Other skeptical cartoonists drew on the line made famous by Kermit the Frog, one of the original Muppets created by Jim Henson. In a February 10 cartoon by (not shown here) Michael Ramirez, AOC, shown reading a newspaper that bears a hostile headline (“Green New Deal Utter Nonsense”), laments that “it’s not easy being green.” Kermit, seated next to her, asks, “I have a frog-sized brain, what’s your excuse?”

In Bob Gorrell’s February 12 cartoon, shown below, AOC is depicted as the Muppet, and the discomfort of being green is transferred to the taxpayer.

Gorrell cartoon

Other cartoonists, on both the right and the left, used unicorns to signify what they perceived to be the fanciful ambitions of the GND. “Who needs airplanes and cow toots when you can have unicorns and rainbows,” exclaims the AOC astride the flying unicorn in Nate Beeler’s February 12 cartoon. The clearly concerned Democrat-donkey riding with her seems oblivious.

In the Scott Stantis cartoon from February 12, AOC is shown riding a mechanical unicorn, like the rocking horse rides one used to find near the entrances of big department stores. Uncle Sam searches through his coin purse for the “trillions” needed to make the GND operate.

Stantis cartoon

Left-leaning artist Matt Davies, does not really dispute the GOP’s characterization of the GND as “the stuff of fantasy.” He just compares it to the equally fanciful belief, in the view of most Democrats, that “tax cuts pay for themselves,” which he represents with a framed picture of a unicorn on the wall behind a GOP operative reading a newspaper account of the GND.

Before turning to the more vigorous rejoinders offered by cartoonists on the left, it is worth noting that none of the cartoons from right-leaning artists depict any impacts from climate change – or, for that matter and despite the February timing, even wearing winter clothes . In those showing an outdoor scene, the sky is blue and the clouds white and friendly. There are no droughts, no floods, no heat-waves, no record-breaking storms or wildfires. Instead the artists offer images of stranded high-speed rail trains, Amish buggies, paddy wagons operated by “flatulence police,” and, yes, cows, kermits, unicorns, and AOC.

Ironically, only two of these February cartoons depict snow or people in winter wear. An unconscious admission that global warming is already occurring?

In two cartoons by the Washington Post’s Tom Toles, by contrast, the world is engulfed by a flaming orange “climate crisis.” In his first response to the GND, or more accurately to the reaction to the GND, Toles shows the GOP – represented by a plump figure in a red, white and blue carnival barker suit – walking away from AOC and her GND. “If I ignore them,” he says, “maybe they’ll go away.”

Toles’ second take on the furor surrounding the GND, published on February 14, focuses on Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who is also the subject of a February 14 cartoon by Chan Lowe. Both cartoonists highlight McConnell’s cynicism in using the climate crisis to wound Democrats – the first responders in this moment – politically.

Toles cartoon

Granted, those first few weeks of February offered left-leaning cartoonists several other targets for their satire, notably President Trump’s border wall proposals and “national emergency” declaration, budget negotiations to avoid a second government shutdown, and the President’s bizarre and rambling February 16 White House Rose Garden press conference.

One is left to wonder which set of cartoonists’ GND pieces – those supporting, or those opposing, the initiative – reached larger audiences or had more impact. But in terms of quantity of cartoons alone, the imbalance is clear, and those supporting appear to have been badly outnumbered by those criticizing.

Five to one.

0 0

Printable Version  |  Link to this page


Comments 1 to 1:

  1. It's just ridiculous.  Greening America energy, repairing her infrastructure, improving health care and so forth would create jobs, increase the tax take, reduce welfare payments and in every way revitalize the sagging economy of the USA.  The benefits would be primarly to the people rather than the uber rich and perhaps this explains all the propoganda against the Green New Deal.  As long as politicians depend on the financing of their next election campaign from the vested interests, even the ones that pay lip service to the idea will never do anything substantial to push it forward.

    0 0

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.

The Consensus Project Website


(free to republish)

© Copyright 2024 John Cook
Home | Translations | About Us | Privacy | Contact Us