Climate Science Glossary

Term Lookup

Enter a term in the search box to find its definition.

Settings

Use the controls in the far right panel to increase or decrease the number of terms automatically displayed (or to completely turn that feature off).

Term Lookup

Settings


All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.

Home Arguments Software Resources Comments The Consensus Project Translations About Donate

Twitter Facebook YouTube Pinterest

RSS Posts RSS Comments Email Subscribe


Climate's changed before
It's the sun
It's not bad
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
Animals and plants can adapt
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...



Username
Password
Keep me logged in
New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts

Archives

Climate Hustle

1934 hits the top ten!

Posted on 24 August 2007 by John Cook

There's been much talk across the blogosphere of late regarding the top ten hottest years since NASA discovered an error in their temperature data. The skeptic argument 1934 is the hottest year on record has been bandied around and even cracked the Skeptical Science Top Ten - it's currently the #9 most used argument and likely to climb further over the next few weeks. Now granted, I started this database in May so it's only an indication of the arguments used over the last 4 months. Nevertheless, the 1934 argument's sudden ubiquitiousness is a surprise.

Two misconceptions commonly appear. The first is NASA's data error was caused by a Y2K bug. That the error began in January 2000 has nothing to do with Y2K - it's a mixup over data corrections with the NOAA. NASA obtain much of their temperature data from the NOAA who adjust the data to filter out inhomogeneities, urban warming and time-of-observation bias (more on NOAA adjustments). From January 2000, NASA were mistakenly using unadjusted data. A few websites even go so far as to claim "global warming is just a Y2K bug".

More serious is the misconception that the data corrections are significant at a global level. NASA's temperature adjustments only apply to 48 U.S. states. As the USA comprises only 2% of the globe, this has had infinitesimal effect globally. The change to the global temperature is less than a thousandth of a degree and has made no difference to the global trend.

While some of the original blogs mention the corrections as USA only, the emphasis is on NASA's error and changes to the top ten list. This has led some to erroneously get the impression that 1934 is the hottest year globally. From this, the Chinese whispers phenomenon took hold and many blogs now report 1934 is globally the hottest year on record. It's a shame such a misconceived argument should make our top ten list - I imagine this is how Google engineers feel when spam websites make their top ten search engine results.

More on 1934...

0 0

Bookmark and Share Printable Version  |  Link to this page

Comments

Comments 1 to 2:

  1. The Arctic is 3% of the land mass of the planet. Following your logic does this imply that any reporting of global warming in this region is also of infinitesimal significance globally?

    Perhaps you can elaborate in this article on why some regions of the planet have infinitesimal significance while others have enormous significance when they are more or less of comparable size? There could be plausible reasons why some regions of the planet have more significance than others, perhaps.
    0 0
  2. Will Nitschke
    You make an argument that would indeed be valid if the comparison was similar territories, but polar ocean vs temperate land does make a difference because of the differenve in water volume of terrestrial glaciers and the polar caps. A comparison of the 48 states to Australia would be somewhat closer.
    0 0

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.



The Consensus Project Website

THE ESCALATOR

(free to republish)


© Copyright 2019 John Cook
Home | Links | Translations | About Us | Privacy | Contact Us