Climate Science Glossary

Term Lookup

Enter a term in the search box to find its definition.

Settings

Use the controls in the far right panel to increase or decrease the number of terms automatically displayed (or to completely turn that feature off).

Term Lookup

Settings


All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.

Home Arguments Software Resources Comments The Consensus Project Translations About Support

Bluesky Facebook LinkedIn Mastodon MeWe

Twitter YouTube RSS Posts RSS Comments Email Subscribe


Climate's changed before
It's the sun
It's not bad
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
Animals and plants can adapt
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...



Username
Password
New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts

Archives

2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #32

Posted on 11 August 2024 by BaerbelW, Doug Bostrom, John Hartz

A listing of 36 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, August 4, 2024 thru Sat, August 10, 2024.

Story of the week

What's our Story of the Week? Is it the AMOC being more likely than not to collapse by 2050? The eye-popping late-winter Antarctic heatwave? 

Ordinarily any of a half-dozen stories in this week's listing could have been our focus. Instead, "we interrupt regular programming" to bring you a special bulletin, via ProPublica. This news is connected with Project 2025, a scheme fostered by the conservative (self-described) Heritage Foundation to jump start the next US presidential administration (of the politically Right variety) with a freeze-dried, fully comprehensive policy suite that if implemented will radically alter and many cases severely diminish services provided to the US public by the US government.

Expert analysis suggests that if signficantly executed, Project 2025 would leave the US federal government's ability to inform public policy with cutting edge research severely degraded. And yes, of course there's a climate connection. 

After barely a few months the United States will elect a president superseding the incumbent but possibly confronting us with a warmed-over replacement. US voters will choose between "reduce, reuse, recycle" and "let's try a new product." Whomever is elected in this cycle the outcome will be very unusual, with wildly different significances. The US may end up with its first female head of state, a historically unprecedented event. On the other hand, a recycled president and administration would play out as an extremely rare situation for the US, and— thanks to Project 2025— in this case there's also distinct possibility of the rare circumstance of entirely novel, ground-breaking history being made. 

What could be so new and different about 45 becoming 47? Famliarity can be deceiving. From all indications, a recycled US president will include an entourage that has wasted few lessons learned from previous experience. As with the previous instance of this candidate's service there is little hint that the candidate himself has organic instincts for creating a coherent public policy agenda; he claims to be ignorant of key actors in his previous administration, leaving little room for charitable interpretation. 

Nature abhors a vacuum. A public policy vacuum created by a president uninterested in serious effort on public service and its myriad of minutiae will be filled by whatever is most easily to hand. Common sense suggests that prefab policy encountering the path of least resistance is likely to fill this void. Project 2025 is chiefly authored by members of the recycled candidate's previous administration, leaving ideally low friction for the fruit of their labor to find a home. 

But supposing we do end up with a belated redo of Donald Trump's first term, how will Project 2025 reach fruition? A cold start of an entire presidential administration is a monumental task, after all. This is the subject of Project 2025's so-called "4th Pillar," a 180 day schedule for spinning up an new presidency while simultaneously bending  the US federal government into a new and unfamiliar shape.

The Heritage Foundation has been assiduously keeping this detailed implementation plan under wraps, a puzzling choice taking into consideration that reasonable people believe what's kept hidden can't suffer daylight for one reason or another. Now ProPublica has been supplied with what seems to be instructional material in connection with this secret 180 day plan (and yes, this does begin to sound like raving lunacy but here we are— arguable lunatics are in the room). Much of this material is fairly astounding in terms of discontuity with what we've come to understand as the US federal goverment. 

Here's the climate connection; we'll let it stand as metaphor for the whole enterprise:

In one video, Bethany Kozma, a conservative activist and former deputy chief of staff at the U.S. Agency for International Development in the Trump administration, downplays the seriousness of climate change and says the movement to combat it is really part of a ploy to “control people.”

“If the American people elect a conservative president, his administration will have to eradicate climate change references from absolutely everywhere,” Kozma says.

Bold ours. Notably the previous operational instance of this particular assemblage of policy influencers did indeed air-brush a lot of climate information from US government publications. Given the nature of Poject 2025 and the informed track laid by its authors, there's every reason to believe they'll be much more effective next time, should that come to pass. 

We encourage our readers to jump over to ProPublica and read the entire expose. 

Stories we promoted this week, by publication date:

Before August 4

August 4

August 5

August 6

August 7

August 8

August 9

August 10

If you happen upon high quality climate-science and/or climate-myth busting articles from reliable sources while surfing the web, please feel free to submit them via this Google form so that we may share them widely. Thanks!

0 0

Printable Version  |  Link to this page

Comments

There have been no comments posted yet.

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.



The Consensus Project Website

THE ESCALATOR

(free to republish)


© Copyright 2024 John Cook
Home | Translations | About Us | Privacy | Contact Us