Climate Science Glossary

Term Lookup

Enter a term in the search box to find its definition.

Settings

Use the controls in the far right panel to increase or decrease the number of terms automatically displayed (or to completely turn that feature off).

Term Lookup

Settings


All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.

Home Arguments Software Resources Comments The Consensus Project Translations About Donate

Twitter Facebook YouTube Pinterest MeWe

RSS Posts RSS Comments Email Subscribe


Climate's changed before
It's the sun
It's not bad
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
Animals and plants can adapt
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...



Username
Password
New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts

Archives

Resources to give facts a fighting chance against misinformation

Posted on 8 December 2020 by BaerbelW

Author's note: This blog post is a repost from SAP Community where I published it as a follow up to a 30 minute online session during which I had a chance to share some resources to combat misinformation. The content is relevant for any (scientific) topic not just climate science and is therefore a bit more far-ranging in nature than usual.

After the 7th Coffee Corner Meet-Up where I was happy to host the break-out room to share some information and resources of how to tackle misinformation related to climate change (and other topics) I collected some information in a response in the coffee corner thread. I think that identifying and tackling misinformation wherever it raises its ugly head is an extremely important skill for everybody to have. Otherwise, we'll not stand much of a chance to make fact-based policy decisions and commendable initiatives like SAP's Climate 21 will fall flat on their faces or will not have an effect quickly enough. This blog post therefore contains information about many resources which can help with giving facts a fighting chance against misinformation.

While I've not been actively involved with the creation of these resources, I've known the lead authors of several of them (Stephan Lewandowsky and John Cook) for many years, have worked on the German translations and am currently coordinating the overall translation efforts (in my spare time) for their handbooks. So, let's get started with breaking the wave of misinformation!

Scroll through from top to bottom or follow the links to The Debunking Handbook 2020The Conspiracy Theory HandbookThe Consensus HandbookThe FLICC Poster - The History of FLICCThe Cranky Uncle AppThe Bad News GameGoViral! - Harmony Square

FightingChance


The Debunking Handbook 2020

dbh-2020The compact Debunking Handbook 2020 is essential reading if you'd like to get a handle on the most important research findings and current expert advice about debunking misinformation. It contains information about why misinformation can do damage, where disinformation comes from, why misinformation can be sticky, how to prevent misinformation from sticking, and why it's important to debunk often and properly.

The handbook is a consensus document that was created by an innovative process that involved a series of predefined steps, all of which were followed and documented and are publicly available. The authors were invited based on their scientific status in the field, and they all agreed on all points made in the handbook. The authors therefore believe that the new Handbook reflects the scientific consensus about how to combat misinformation.


The Conspiracy Theory Handbook

Conspiracy

Conspiracy theories attempt to explain events as the secretive plots of powerful people. While conspiracy theories are not typically supported by evidence, this doesn’t stop them from blossoming. Conspiracy theories damage society in a number of ways. To help minimize these harmful effects, The Conspiracy Theory Handbook, by Stephan Lewandowsky and John Cook, explains why conspiracy theories are so popular, how to identify the traits of conspiratorial thinking, and what are effective response strategies. As you'll be very much aware, conspiracy theories related to COVID-19 unfortunately abound and are a big risk for societies around the globe.

The Handbook distills the most important research findings and expert advice on dealing with conspiracy theories. It also introduces the abbreviation CONSPIR which serves as a mnemonic to more easily remember these seven traits of conspiratorial thinking:

  • Contradictory
  • Overriding suspicion
  • Nefarious intent
  • Something must be wrong
  • Persecuted Victim
  • Immune to Evidence
  • Re-interpreting Randomness

The Consensus Handbook

chbThe Consensus Handbook provides a brief history of the scientific consensus on climate change. The authors John Cook, Sander van der Linden, Edward Maibach and Stephan Lewandowsky summarize the research quantifying the level of scientific agreement on human-caused global warming. They examine what the public thinks about the consensus and the misinformation campaigns that have sought to confuse people. They also look at how we should respond to this particular misinformation and how best to communicate the scientific consensus. Lastly, they answer some of the objections to communicating the consensus.

 


The FLICC Poster

flicc poster

Disinformation campaigns use the same five main techniques and tricks time and again ­– not only on climate change and COVID-19, but on many other science-related issues. Within five main categories (see below), further subtypes of tricks can be found, more than twenty of which John Cook has now described. Once you have seen through the basic strategies, says Cook, alongside other communication psychologists, you are much less susceptible to further attempts at disinformation – you are basically immunized against their spread. The FLICC poster is the result of a successful collaboration between Skeptical Science and their German language partner site klimafakten.de. You can download A3-format version of the poster from the klimafakten website or order A2 printouts from them.

The five main techniques depicted in the poster are these and they can be easily remembered via their mnemonic FLICC:

Fake experts are people who convey the appearance of expertise without possessing any actual relevant expertise.

Logical fallacies are false arguments leading to an invalid conclusion.

Impossible expectations demand unrealistic standards of proof before acting on the science.

Cherry picking involves focusing on select pieces of data while ignoring anything conflicting with the desired conclusion.

Conspiracy theories are created when science deniers accuse the world’s scientists of a massive, global conspiracy.


The History of FLICC

If the FLICC poster piqued your interest in the techniques of science denial, you'll like John Cook's account about "The History of FLICC" which he first published on his Cranky Uncle website (more about Cranky Uncle below) in March 2020.

When John Cook led a 2015 collaboration between the University of Queensland and Skeptical Science to develop the free online course Denial101x: Making Sense of Climate Science Denial, the made FLICC the underlying framework of the entire course. An important component of their debunking of the most common myths about climate change was identifying the denial techniques in each myth. A common comment we received from students was how much they appreciated learning about FLICC.

Since moving to the Center for Climate Change Communication at George Mason University, John has continued to build the FLICC taxonomy. In his collaboration with critical thinking philosophers Peter Ellerton and David Kinkead, he was introduced to reasoning fallacies that hadn’t yet been included.. As John begun developing the Cranky Uncle game, he began a series of fallacy quizzes where he gradually built the taxonomy up as he introduced people to an ever-growing collection of denial techniques (note the differing difficulty levels between quiz #1 and quiz #8). When Stephan Lewandowsky and John Cook published The Conspiracy Theory Handbook, they added the seven traits of conspiratorial thinking. Here is the latest version of the FLICC taxonomy (with all the icons freely available and shareable on Wikimedia):

FLICC


The Cranky Uncle App

Cranky Uncle is the creation of scientist and cartoonist John Cook, who uses cartoons, humor, and critical thinking to expose the misleading techniques of science denial and build public resilience against misinformation. To explain why and how some people reject scientific evidence, Cook created the character Cranky Uncle, the family member we all have who thinks he knows better than the world’s scientists.

Via his Cranky Uncle blog posts, John provides free resources which can be used by teachers and science communicators to point out and combat misinformation. This is currently focused on critical thinking about climate science and COVID-19 but the information is transferrable to other topics.

The free Cranky Uncle smartphone game is currently being developed and in BETA-test, in collaboration with Autonomy, after a successful crowdfunding campaign in January. The plan is to release the first version of the game in December 2020. Sign up to receive the latest news and developments of the Cranky Uncle game.

This free smartphone game uses cartoons and gameplay to interactively explain the denial techniques used to cast doubt on (climate) science. Responding to misinformation is more important than ever in this post-truth era where science and facts are under constant assault. Research has identified a key solution is making the public more resilient against fake news.

In science, it’s called ‘active inoculation’ — learn how to spot attempts to mislead by first learning the techniques of denial. In the Cranky Uncle game, players are mentored by a cartoon personification of climate science denial. In this first version of the game, Cranky Uncle explains 14 techniques of science denial, from fake experts to cherry picking and a variety of different logical fallacies.

Update Dec. 15, 2020: The Cranky Uncle App was released in the AppStore and can be downloaded to iPhones and iPads! The Android version should become available soon.

CrankyGame 


Some other active inoculation offerings

Until the Cranky Uncle app becomes available, here are some other offerings you could try out if you'd like to give active inoculation a try yourself. These games have been developed by cognitive scientists and can be played online. I've followed one of the lead scientists for these games - Sander van der Linden - on social media for a while and he has also collaborated with Stephan Lewandowsky and John Cook on several occasions.

The Bad News Game

In Bad News, you take on the role of fake news-monger. Drop all pretense of ethics and choose a path that builds your persona as an unscrupulous media magnate. But keep an eye on your ‘followers’ and ‘credibility’ meters. Your task is to get as many followers as you can while slowly building up fake credibility as a news site. But watch out: you lose if you tell obvious lies or disappoint your supporters! This game has already led to scientific research like this recently published open access article: Good news about Bad News: Gamified inoculation boosts confidence and cognitive immunity against fake news

BadNewsGame

Go Viral

In 2020, Dr van der Linden's lab launched GoViral! in collaboration with the UK Cabinet Office with support from the WHO and United Nations. Go Viral is aimed at inoculating people against misinformation about COVID-19 specifically. You’ll learn about some of the most common strategies used to spread false and misleading information about the virus. Understanding these tricks allows you to resist them the next time you come across them online. Several articles about the game are available on the University of Cambridge's website.

GoViral

Harmony Square

Harmony Square is a game about fake news. The game's setting is the idyllic Harmony Square, a small neighborhood mildly obsessed with democracy. You, the player, are hired as Chief Disinformation Officer. Over the course of 4 short levels,  your job is to disturb the peace and quiet by fomenting internal divisions and pitting its residents against  each other. The goal of the game is to expose the tactics and manipulation techniques that are used to mislead people, build up a  following, or exploit societal tensions for political purposes.  Harmony Square works as a psychological "vaccine" against disinformation: playing it builds cognitive resistance against common forms of manipulation that you may encounter online.

Scientists who worked on the development of this game found that playing Harmony Square improves people's ability to spot manipulation techniques in social media posts, increases their confidence in spotting such techniques, and reduces their willingness to share manipulative content with people in their network. The results of this study were published in the journal Harvard Misinformation Review, and can be found here.

HarmonySquare


Hope you find these resources helpful! Should you have examples where any of them did in fact come in handy (or where they might come in handy!), please share your experience and thoughts in the comments.

0 0

Printable Version  |  Link to this page

Comments

There have been no comments posted yet.

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.



The Consensus Project Website

THE ESCALATOR

(free to republish)


© Copyright 2021 John Cook
Home | Links | Translations | About Us | Privacy | Contact Us